Its been just over 10 years now since Peter Sell first brought attention to the fact that that Dogwood (Cornus sanguinea), as understood by British botanists, included two non-native taxa i.e. Southern Dogwood (Cornus australis or sanguinea subsp. australis depending on preference) and Asian Dogwood (Cornus koenigii). Both of which were subsequently picked up from Stace 3 onwards.
Southern Dogwood is very widely planted, indeed many if not most 'native' plantings will be this and on this basis I think dogwood should be avoided in native planting mixes. Clearly growers are making no effort to distinguish native from non-native. As well as planted occurrences, it is also rapidly and aggressively spreading by seed from plantings. For example, it is increasingly being found in semi-natural habitats in Eastern England and West Yorkshire. In my opinion, it is still under-recorded in lowland England, and until more recorders split them (which is quite easy, only requiring a check of the hairs on the underside of the leaf) we won't truly understand how far it has established. Once known it can usually be told at a glance, although the hairs should always be checked.
In comparison, Asian Dogwood is much less commonly seen and of more patchy occurrence. I usually only see it planted into the wild and it seems less inclined to self-sow. So it was interesting to find a bush locally that is clearly of bird sown origin (there are mass-plantings within a few 100m as the berry-eating bird flies).
No comments:
Post a Comment